The Bridge Experts
  • Home
  • Articles
  • The Bridge Fellowship
    • Learn from the Best
    • Bridge Can Be Easier
    • General Coaching + Simulations
    • Gift certificates
  • Give us a Hand!

Negative Inferences

2/6/2020

0 Comments

 

Author

Marcelo Branco

Good declarers are constantly drawing inferences from the cards played by the defenders...
Honor leads usually reveal a touching honor; a high spot indicates that the opening leader is short or lacks high honors in the suit; declarer play is always based on deductions of this sort. 

There are situations which are not as blatant. For example, if you eliminate the side suits in a trump contract and give up the lead so as to force the opponents to break up a suit in which you have Ax in your hand and Q10 in the dummy, if the opponents could choose which hand would win the throw-in trick and LHO won the trick (i.e. he will start the trick and dummy, with Q10, will be the next to play), you may be sure that LHO does not have the King. (If he had the King, he would have let his partner win the trick so as to play the problem suit correctly for the defense). 

There are many discussions, in articles and books, about this theme. But it is not so common to find discussions about what may be called negative inferences, that is, inferences based on what the opponents did not do.

​You are playing in 3NT after a strong 2 Club opening, a 2 Diamond response, a 3 Diamond bid by the strong hand, and 3NT by the weak hand finished the auction. 
Picture
The lead was the Five of clubs. East won with the King, and played back the Jack, then the Ten, and finally the Four... and you are still alive since clubs were 4-4 originally. You discarded one spade and 2 diamonds from dummy.

West, upon winning the last club trick, played a spade to dummy's (now) singleton Ace. And now you must guess diamonds to make your contract. You cash the Ace of diamonds (no luck there, all you see are small cards), and play 3 rounds of hearts, ending in hand with your Jack. Everybody follows suit.

Now you play a diamond from your hand, and West plays the 9. What should you do?

If you play the King ("Eight ever, nine never"), you are in effect playing the opening leader to have started with the 3 hearts he has shown, 2 diamonds (only), exactly four clubs, and therefore four spades, i.e., a 4=3=2=4 hand. And if you finesse in diamonds, you are playing for him to have one extra diamond, that can come only at the expense of the spade suit (since the count in the other suits is known by now). That is, you will be playing him for a 3=3=3=4 hand. In the first case, LHO would have had 4 spades and 4 clubs, and he would have led clubs from a suit such as A865. Is that likely? Is it not more probable that he would have led spades (from whichever holding he has in the suit)?

Reasoning like that, I finessed in diamonds, and was rewarded when East showed out.

If you are a math genius, willing to do this kind of calculations in your head while playing the hand (which is not my case, truth be told), you will see that the 4=3=2=4 hand is almost twice as likely as the 3=3=3=4 hand, which is an argument against the diamond finesse. You have to weigh this kind of consideration along with the psychological aspects of the choice of opening lead. As you know by now, in my opinion the psychological clue is dominant in our example hand, but there are situations in which the math is compelling; each player must make his own decisions at the table.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    September 2021
    May 2021
    December 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    September 2019
    August 2019

    Categories

    All
    1st FSO
    2020 Brazilian Trials
    2/1
    Adriano Rodrigues
    Advanced
    Bidding Judgment
    Bidding Systems
    Bobby Levin
    Books
    China
    Contested Auction
    Declarer Play
    Defense
    Diego Brenner
    Double Dummy
    Emilio La Rovere
    Ernesto Muzzio
    Expert
    FSO
    Gabriel Chagas
    Giorgio-duboin
    Henrique Salomão
    Inferences
    Intermediate
    Ira Rubin
    Israel
    Jeovani Salomão
    João Paulo Campos
    Marcelo Branco
    Marcos Thoma
    Miguel Villas Boas
    Opening Lead
    Pablo Ravenna
    Paulo Brum
    Pietro Berlusconi
    Poland
    Pressure Bidding
    Raises
    Roberto Barbosa
    Roberto Mello
    Singapore
    Slam Bidding
    Stefano Tommasini
    Sweden
    Tournament Report
    Transfer Responses To 1C
    Trump Maneuvers
    USA
    Video
    World Youth Teams

    RSS Feed

Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Site powered by Page One Agency
  • Home
  • Articles
  • The Bridge Fellowship
    • Learn from the Best
    • Bridge Can Be Easier
    • General Coaching + Simulations
    • Gift certificates
  • Give us a Hand!